and more in a single search tool across platforms. Read the announcement here. |
07/15/2022 06:11 AM
Hi all,
We configured the Saviynt for Saviynt ENABLEACCOUNTJSON and DISABLEACCOUNTJSON to enable or disable saviynt users and exploit an actionable report to do so due to client's requirements.
{"EnableAccountQry":["update users set statuskey= 1 ,updatedate = utc_timestamp() where userkey = ${user.id}"]}
{"DisableAccountQry":["update users set statuskey= 0, updatedate = utc_timestamp() where userkey = ${user.id}"]}
We have two problems:
Can you suggest a resolution for both issues?
Kind regards,
Matteo
Solved! Go to Solution.
07/15/2022 06:27 AM
Hi @JustSalva ,
So if you setup a User Create/Update Form and submit a request for user updation, then you will be able to see the user update history and run rules from it, provided rules are set to 'Trigger when user is updated from UI' .
Or
You can build a SaviyntForSaviynt REST connector integration using Saviynt's APIs. Example :
and update user's status using the above api. This will also register is the user's history. And rules will be evaluated provided your rule is set to 'Trigger when user is updated from API' .
07/15/2022 06:50 AM
Hi Sahaj,
thank you for your reply. The second option seems the one more in line with our requirements, but to trigger ENABLEACCOUNTJSON and DISABLEACCOUNTJSON from an actionable report would't we need to first import all saviynt users as accounts? Actionable reports require the accountkey to trigger those actions
07/15/2022 06:54 AM
Hi @JustSalva ,
Yes, you can have the SaviyntForSaviynt DB connector as the Recon Connection and import users as account in the SaviyntForSaviynt endpoint. Then use the REST connector as the provisioning connection.
07/15/2022 07:07 AM
perfect, I'll try, thank you!