PARTNERS - Please join us for our upcoming webinar: Leveraging Intelligent Recommendations for Operational Transformation. AMS Partners Click HERE | EMEA/APJ Click HERE
This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Hi experts,We are using the same API to get the membership details for two different Entitlement Types. The problem is that we see only one Entitlement type membership data in Saviynt, not both.For Example the below response we are trying to get both...
Hi Saviynt Experts, Below is the status threshold JSON which we are using in the REST connector.{"statusAndThresholdConfig": { "statusColumn": "customproperty6", "activeStatus": [ false ], "deleteLinks": true, "accountThre...
Hi all,We are managing AzureAD groups in Saviynt. Once I submit a request for group creation after approval the Create Entitlement pending task is created but when I run the WSTRY job the task is not picked up.I also verified the configuration in OOT...
Hi Experts,In one of my dashboard configurations, I added the Global JSON Query config, and I also set it at Global Configuration => Analytics => Application Global Filter. I selected Endpoint.But I don't see the filter on the Dashboard page I tried ...
Hi team,When I try to delete or update any group from ARS using Manage Groups it's not going to approval. The Update Entitlement and Delete Entitlement pending tasks are created automatically. Is it expected behavior or is there any way we can handle...
hi @rushikeshvartak ,after changing from "processingType": "httpAcctToEnt", to SequentialAndIterative I don't see membership details it totally got removed, previously when I kept httpAcctToEnt at least it brings one entitlement type membership.
Hi @rushikeshvartak inconsistency is that recon bringing only one Entitlement type membership either JobAdmin or userRoles. JOSN{"globalSettings": {"dateFormat": "yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS'Z'"},"accountParams": {"connection": "acctAuth","createUsers"...
@rushikeshvartak ,the mapping is already done in the code that I shared one is mapped with Job_ID, and the other one is with User_Role_ID. Problem is that we see inconsistency when we run recon.