Announcing the Saviynt Knowledge Exchange unifying the Saviynt forums, documentation, training,
and more in a single search tool across platforms. Read the announcement here.

In the user form, make an attribute visible depending on other user attribute value

neotello
New Contributor II
New Contributor II

We want to show an attribute only for a specific employee type. Is it possible to configure an attribute in the user form (Admin-Global config-Identity Lifecycle-Register User Form )visible only if the other attribute has a specific value?

For example, imagine that you have two kinds of users [Internals and externals] (I mean, two possible options for the attribute EmployeeType). Could we configure that an attribute associated with the column Customproperty1 would be visible only for externals (employee type = external)?

3 REPLIES 3

adriencosson
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor

Hi @neotello ,

You can leverage the below configuration : 

  • Your parent attribute is called "employeeType"
  • Your child attribute to be hidden is called "customproperty1"
  • In the "Action String" parameter of "employeeType", you can use : 

 

HIDE###customproperty1###Internal___SHOW###customproperty1###External___HIDE###customproperty1###___

 

  • Make sure the "employeeType" has "Mapping" in "What action to perform when Parent attribute changes?" parameter

Hope this helps !

Regards,
Adrien COSSON

pmahalle
All-Star
All-Star

Hi @neotello ,

Yes it's possible. You need to create two dynamic attributes, one for employee type and one which you want to show or hide based on employee type.

In first dynamic attribute you need to put appropriate Action String in order to show or hide other dynamic attribute.

Refer: 

https://docs.saviyntcloud.com/bundle/EIC-Admin-v23x/page/Content/Chapter02-Identity-Repository/Viewi...

Hope it helps.


Pandharinath Mahalle(Paddy)
If this reply answered your question, please Accept As Solution to help other who may have a same problem. Give Kudos 🙂

neotello
New Contributor II
New Contributor II

Thanks guys!
I'm going to work following your answers 🙂