and more in a single search tool across platforms. Read the announcement here. |
09/05/2022 12:45 AM
09/05/2022 02:56 AM
Saviynt doesn't have filter on modify account request.
Workaround :
Create Dynamic attribute on Update Account only & apply your logic
2. You can map account to admin user ( if that account is never going to be requested)
09/09/2022 01:07 AM
Thank you for your reply!.
Is there a way i can associate the value chosen from the DA to the Account Name attribute in the request. i.e the accountname, the request is being raised for should be same as the value i select in the DA
09/09/2022 03:40 AM
No its not feasible. However in connected application you can create accountname with dynamic attribute value but it will create confusion as request history show different account name where as actual account name is different
09/08/2022 02:15 AM
@Mahak_Acharya
There is no filter available for the same endpoint. You can accommodate a dynamic attribute to validate which account has been requested for modification and based on that you can apply Dynamic attribute show hide to prevent any attributes being shown on modification page.
Similarly the dynamic attribute can be used with entitlement query to not show any entitlements for request.
DA could provide a value like 1 or 0.
Based on this you could hide your remaining Dynamic attributes. Also you could build your entitlmeent query like : and ${AccountCheckerDA}=1 .
When 1=1, then you see the entitlements for request.
09/09/2022 01:08 AM
Thank you for your reply!.
Is there a way i can associate the value chosen from the DA to the Account Name attribute in the request. i.e the accountname, the request is being raised for should be same as the value i select in the DA