Saviynt unveils its cutting-edge Intelligence Suite products to revolutionize Identity Security!
Click HERE to see how Saviynt Intelligence is transforming the industry.
Saviynt Copilot Icon

Escaping backslash problem in Dataset

Shub4Sav
New Contributor II
New Contributor II

Hi all,

I'm running into an issue with handling backslashes (\) in server paths within a dataset that I upload. The dataset includes paths formatted with single and double backslashes, such as \\abcd01\efg$\01\.
In the dataset preview, the path appears as \abcd01efg$01, which is expected behavior based on escaping rules.
However, when I create a new user, a new account is created in the AD Endpoint (following a technical rule), and the path data from the dataset should populate customproperty4 in the account (dynamic Attribute).
The problem is that the path format in customproperty4 is not what I expect; for instance, instead of \\abcd01\efg$\01\, it shows up as \\abcd01efg$04, which differs from both the dataset and the preview.
Additionally, if I request a new account via ARS, the escaping behaves differently. By using \\\\abcd01\\efg$\\11\\, I manage to get the expected output, \\abcd01\efg$\01\, but only for the ARS request,
when account created via technical rule the result looks like \\\\abcd01\\efg$\\04\\.

I've tried various formats in the dataset, adjusting the count of backslashes, like \\abcd01\\efg$\\11\\ or \\\abcd01\\efg$\\11\\, and so forth.
No matter which variation I use, I can't achieve a stable double backslash at the start and single backslashes in between across all contexts.
My goal is to have \\abcd01\efg$\01\ correctly written into the account’s customproperty4 field via the dynamic attribute, with the account itself being created through the technical rule.

 

I’ve included a table that shows the different versions I tried in the dataset and the resulting values in the account field and dataset preview.

Shub4Sav_0-1730973071044.png

If the technical rule or dynamic attribute plays a role, I’d be happy to provide further details on those as well.

Any insights or suggestions for achieving consistent escaping behavior in the account field would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

0 REPLIES 0