Click HERE to see how Saviynt Intelligence is transforming the industry. |
10/24/2024 08:50 AM
If there is an owner on terminate option set, and a user update rule that updates ownership when terminated, which would take priority?
Solved! Go to Solution.
10/24/2024 08:52 AM
10/24/2024 08:54 AM
I can select "Owner on terminate" at the user level
I can also define a user update rule to can transfer ownership.
If both are set, which would take priority? The owner set at the user level, or the owner picked by the user update rule?
10/24/2024 08:56 AM
10/24/2024 09:02 AM
so by themselves, they do nothing?
So, in order for a user update rule to transfer ownership, the user must specify who they will transfer ownership to?
if i set the "transfer to" field without a user update rule, then nothing would happen when terminated.
And same for the other scenario where I make a user update rule, but the user doesn't have the "transfer ownership to" field set? Nothing would happen in this scenario?
10/24/2024 09:11 AM
if i set the "transfer to" field without a user update rule, then nothing would happen when terminated. Yes nothing is happen as its static field on user field
And same for the other scenario where I make a user update rule, but the user doesn't have the "transfer ownership to" field set? Nothing would happen in this scenario? default it will be assigned to manager set for user
10/24/2024 09:16 AM
"default it will be assigned to manager set for user"
So by default, if nothing is set (uur or oot) it will still transfer ownership to manager?
10/24/2024 09:18 AM
10/24/2024 09:20 AM
and if UUR is set, but no OOT, then it would default to manager?
10/24/2024 09:39 AM - edited 10/24/2024 09:40 AM