Saviynt unveils its cutting-edge Intelligence Suite products to revolutionize Identity Security!
Click HERE to see how Saviynt Intelligence is transforming the industry.
This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Hi All,We have a new requirement where we have to store multiple values coming from different attributes from workday to single attribute in Saviynt like below.Workday:Attribute 1 = Value 1Attribute 2 = Value 2Attribute 3= Value 3Saviynt - Customprop...
Hi All,We are trying to user inactiveuseronly functionality to make the missed users from import as inactive. And also we created user update rule to disable accounts associated with these missed users. But somehow user update rule is not picking up ...
Hi All,We are asked to investigate why the wrong user is correlated to account. So we looked at all the possibilities below but still not able to understand why this account correlated to user.User account correlation rule in endpoint: User's Samacco...
Hi Team,Need your inputs for the below usecase.We have 2 datasets Dataset1,Dataset2 and we have to populate the value in CP42 based on conditions on these datasets as belowCP18 in Dataset1 then return exmaple.comCP52 in Dataset2 then return example.c...
Hi Team,Need a information on the below. Once the user identity is created for prehires, in case if the user doesn't join the organization, workday will remove them completely and hence they won't come up in the user feed to Saviynt in the subsequent...
How do we do that .. If i have to write a query like below..CP60= concat(name1,name2,name3)or it should be like below..cp61=name1cp62=name2cp63=name3and CP60= concat(cp61,cp62,cp63) So if we utilize cp61 to cp63 in preprocessor , can we not use these...
Hi Rushikesh, Pls find below. We have to bring in hierarchy to one attribute ..CP60= Manger name, senior mananger name, director name,vp name etc.. These values are different for each userUser import mapping { "ImportType": "RAAS", "ResponsePat...
Thank you Rushikesh for your response. we found the issue. Missed user terminations also to be included along with actual terminations to define termination limit. We had only changed threshold value hence it was failing. We got it fixed.
Thank you Rushikesh. We tried testing this functionality of 'Inactivate' in Job to move the missed users from import to Inactive and also create deprovision tasks w.r.t those users. We also enabled 'user termination from imports' under global configu...
