Workflow issue

[Aniketk]

Hello,

I`m using below condition :

(endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') eq true) or
endpoints.customproperty1 eq 'Yes'

If endpoint name is abc or endpoint customproperty 1 is yes then it should follow 1 level of approval or else 2 level.

If I use the condition (endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') eq true), it`s following 1 level approval for endpoint. However when I add second condition it is giving below error.

on first try it was working fine , but next day it suddenly stopped working.

Kindly help

[nimitdave]

Pls try once like this if it works

((endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') eq true) or
(endpoints.customproperty1 eq 'Yes'))

if it does not then check if (endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') eq true) and (endpoints.customproperty1 eq 'Yes') is working individually. 

[Aniketk]

I tried these changes before , it`s not working.

And second condition i want to call for different endpoint so, if I use and operator it will not work.

[Aniketk]

I tried with (endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') eq true) or (endpoints.endpointname.contains('xyz') eq true) to allow both endpoints have one level approval, but still second condition is not working.

[sk]

Use below condition with expression language as groovy

(endpoints.get(request_access.id).endpointname.contains('abc') eq true) or (endpoints.get(request_access.id).customproperty1 == 'Yes'))

If it didn't work try without groovy as well

[Aniketk]

Thanks for response Saathvik,

But the above query is not working. The issue is only when I`m calling second condition.

My Query also worked when I tried first time, however when I tried after 2 days it was giving me error.

So I`m not sure why it worked first the suddenly next week it was giving error.

[sk]

Do you have CP1 populated for respective endpoint? Can you share the screenshot?

Also if possible please share the logs when this error appears

[rushikeshvartak]

(endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') ) or
endpoints.customproperty1.equalsIgnoreCase('Yes')

[Aniketk]

Still facing issue with 2nd condition

[Aniketk]

No diffrence , when I tried without groovy

[sk]

As per logs issue is happening with first condition only, Please try below conditions. Also initially you mentioned CP1 to check for YES but in workflow you are checking with CP10 not sure which CP you want to validate so based on that change the CP condition accordingly. For now i gave with CP1

endpoints.get(request_access.id).endpointname.contains('abc') or endpoints.get(request_access.id).customproperty1.equalsIgnoreCase('Yes')

or

endpoints.endpointname.contains('abc') or endpoints.customproperty1.equalsIgnoreCase('Yes')

 If it is still an issue please share the new set of logs with new conditions I suggested 

[Aniketk]

Now I have using only single condition which is endpoints.customproperty10.equalsIgnoreCase('Yes').

Still facing same issue.

[sk]

Please share the new set of logs

[Aniketk]

Please find the logs

[sk]

I see two errors one is below, Name I am seeing the workflow name you are testing? 

2023-03-21 14:18:32,142 [https-jsse-nio-443-exec-46] ERROR services.WorkflowService  - Exception in workflow service
org.jbpm.api.JbpmException: no process definition with key 'AD_ADDAccess_Workflow_test2'

 Another error below where somewhere It is trying to doing addition to values where it is getting null for both and  try to do null+null Where is this condition coming from?

2023-03-21 14:18:32,455 [https-jsse-nio-443-exec-46] ERROR errors.GrailsExceptionResolver  - NullPointerException occurred when processing request: [POST] /ECM/workflowmanagement/createrequestfinalstep
Cannot execute null+null. Stacktrace follows:
org.codehaus.groovy.grails.web.pages.exceptions.GroovyPagesException: Error processing GroovyPageView: Cannot execute null+null

[Aniketk]

I don`t see Name error now, any suggestion for 2nd error?

[sk]

I still both errors in logs,  With auto approval or some basic WF did you see the same error? or it is happening with only for this WF? If the issue with this WF only then share the WF logic. 

[Aniketk · Accepted solution]

I have change the Number of tries for provisioning from 7 to 10.

Now workflow is working.