and more in a single search tool across platforms. Read the announcement here. |
09/14/2022 08:44 AM
Hi,
we are tryng to test this user update rule ' User update in UI - Assigned accounts update' but it doesn't work correctly.
In particular when we test this rule, the 5th line does not work. If we go to make the changes on a user who has an organizational position category (CP9) different from what is written in equals it takes the changes and run the rule when it shouldn't.
we also put the parentheses in this way but doesn't work.
can you help us?
Thank you
Noemi
Solved! Go to Solution.
09/14/2022 08:50 AM
09/14/2022 09:23 AM - edited 09/14/2022 09:23 AM
Hello @nfraternali,
When using AND and OR in the same rule, I would suggest to use the Advanced Config.
Could you re-create the rule in an Advanced Config mode and then try ?
03/03/2023 10:27 AM
Hello Avinash,
What table can I use in Advanced Config? Can I use any other tables besides users table? such as roles table, role_user_account table etc.? If yes, could you please give me an example query that check if a user have a specified role name assigned?
Thanks
03/03/2023 12:56 PM
Yes it is
Example:
a.username in (SELECT DISTINCT u.username from users u inner join user_savroles usr on u.userkey=usr.userkey inner join savroles sr on sr.rolekey=usr.rolekey and sr.rolename in ('ROLE_ADMIN'))
03/04/2023 05:21 AM
Thanks a lot Saathvik, This is very helpful!
Specifically, I wanted to use this table below. I'll try it out.
I am wondering the record on this table is generated at request time, approval time or after actual provisioning time? Does Saviynt have kind of temp table concept for different stage of the request/task processing?
03/06/2023 06:15 AM
Record in account_entitlements1 will appear after successful provisioning. And there is no staging concept at least in provisioning process.